|
STEPS
TO BOOST REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
| Fiscal
Measures -- Income Tax Act |
|
1.
Boosting Housing Construction ·
- Repayment
of Housing loan (Section 88)
Tax rebate @ 20% out of Income Tax payable in respect of
repayment of housing loans upto Rs. 20,000/- is insignificant.
This cap of Rs.20,000/- should be removed. Alternatively,
it should be increased upto Rs. 1.0 lakhs.
- 100%
allowability of interest as deductible expense in case of
self-occupied Residential house
Deduction
of interest on housing loans used for self-occupation is
allowed upto an amount of Rs. 1.0 lakhs whereas interest
on housing loans used for rental purpose is allowed in full.
This disparity needs to be removed. Further, cap on completion
of construction by 31st March, 2003 is counter-productive
and hence needs to be removed to boost housing construction.
This will go a long way to fulfil National Housing Policy's
objectives and Government's programmes to encourage people
to own a housing unit.
- Deduction
of Construction Cost
There is a need to introduce a separate section under Chapter
VI-A wherein 100% cost of construction is allowed as deduction
from the gross total income over 5 years in phased manner.
This will give immediate impetus to the economy with enhanced
capacity utilisation of related industries such as steel,
cement, transportation, etc. leading to increase revenue
by way of excise and other taxes.
- Disparity
in Depreciation Rates
Let out Properties At present, the owners of plant & machinery,
motor vehicles, etc. given on lease for business purposes,
are allowed the benefit of depreciation allowance out of
their business income. However, the owners of house property
who have let out their properties are not allowed similar
benefits of depreciation as rental housing is not being
recognized as a business activity. As housing is a national
asset and needs regeneration by
way of modernisation /redevelopment of housing stocks, it
is, therefore, suggested that all properties completed on
or after 1st April 2001 should get the depreciation allowance
@ of 20% p.a. This aspect needs to be provided by incorporating
a suitable explanation under sub-section 1 of Section 32.
- Properties
Constructed for accommodating employees
Buildings constructed by an employer for accommodating his
employees are permitted a depreciation allowance @ 5%. However,
if the plinth area of the dwelling unit is less than 80
sq. mtrs the depreciation allowance is increased to 40%.
The basis of this disparity is irrational and hence needs
to be removed.
It is suggested that under rule 5 (Appendix I) table prescribing
the rates at which depreciation is admissible in item 3(i)
of the block "Buildings" the words "with plinth area not
exceeding 80 square meters" be substituted by the words
"built by employers for accommodating its employees".
- Deletion
of Chapter XXC - Refer Annexure 'A'
|
- Upward
Revision in value for clearance under Sec. 230-A for registration
of transfer of immovable property
By virtue of Section 230-A, where any document is required
to be registered u/s. 17 of the Indian Registration Act,
1908, purports to transfer assign or extinguish the right,
title or interest of any person to or in any property valued
at more than Rs. 5 lakhs, then the registering officer shall
not register such document, unless the Assessing Officer
certifies that such person has either paid or made satisfactory
provision for payment of all existing tax liabilities and
registration of such document will not prejudicially effect
the recovery of such taxes.
The value of five lakhs was substituted for two lakhs by
the Finance Act, 1995, with effect from 1-7-1995 and, as
such, there is an immediate need to raise this limit upto
Rs. 50 lakhs. Alternatively, this limit can be linked with
the limits fixed under Rule 48K of Section 269 UC.
- Development
of infrastructure (Physical and Social) in the definition
of Infrastructure:
The present definition of infrastructure does not cover
all aspects of physical, social, environmental and economic
infrastructure as also various utilities necessary for urban
development.
This has been partially accepted by inclusion of water treatment
and solid waste management in the definition. The inclusion
of remaining aspects of physical and social aspects in the
ambit of urban infrastructure needs to be followed up.
- Deemed
export status and other measures to give boost to foreign
exchange earnings
Real Estate Developers have been making concerted efforts
for sale of property to NRIs and other eligible persons
abroad to mobilize foreign exchange. This is being done
at huge marketing cost. Yet no incentives are being made
available for earning valuable exchange. It is strongly
felt that foreign exchange earned out of sale proceeds of
real estate be considered as deemed export and proportionate
income, as in the case of commodity exporters, be exempt
from taxation. Such a step would encourage the real estate
developers to increase their activities in sale promotion
outside India and mobilise more foreign exchange.
In similarly placed industries, like the Hotel Industry
in particular, even comparatively lesser efforts are involved
but the foreign exchange earned from foreigners merely on
account of their stay in the hotels is treated as deemed
exports. In the case of sale of real estate, on the other
hand, tremendous efforts and marketing inputs are being
applied. Hence, there is every justification to treat the
foreign exchange earned from sale of real estate as deemed
exports to be eligible for tax exemption u/s 80HHC.
It is suggested that under sub-section (i) in Section 80
HHC after the words 'export out of India of any goods or
merchandise' the following words be included:
"or sale proceeds of real estate developers for selling
properties to NRIs/foreign nationals."
|
| Fiscal
Measures - Wealth Tax Act |
|
Urban Land held as stock in trade [Section 2(ea)]- Refer
Annexure 'B' C. |
| Employee
Housing |
| Residential
houses owned by companies have been included in the definition
of assets chargeable to Wealth-tax except in cases where the
same are allotted by a company to its employees or an officer
or a whole-time director, having a gross annual salary of less
than rupees five lakhs. |
| The
above restrictions are counter productive in as much as companies
are discouraged from investing their funds in acquiring house
properties for their senior employees. Hence the above restriction
needs to be removed. |
|
Monetary
and Credit Policy
Separate
allocation of 10% within the overall 40% lending for priority
sector for housing.
Stamp
Duty
Stamp
duty should be brought down to 3% in all states from the current
high levels of 10% and above.
At
present four states have reduced their stamp duty to 0.1%
for mortgage backed securitisation of housing loans. This
is restricting the inflow of funds for securitisation in other
states.
All
other states need to follow up this measure.
|
FISCAL
MEASURES INCOME TAX
Removal of Restrictive Provisions - Chapter XXC
Background
Chapter XX-C was inserted in the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the
Finance Act, 1986 with effect from 1.10.1986 enabling the Central
Government to exercise the power for pre-emptive purchase of
immovable properties in cases where the Appropriate Authority
finds that the apparent consideration for the transfer is lower
by more than 15% as compared to the prevailing market value.
Though, it is true that this Chapter had, initially a salutary
effect in reducing the black component of consideration for
transfer in real estate transactions, the following factors
have reduced its effectiveness and created difficulties in implementation.
|
| The
Hon'ble Supreme court in C.B. Gautam's case has held that the
Appropriate authority has to issue a show-cause notice to the
parties to the transfer before exercising the power of pre-emptive
purchase and also to have some material to hold that there was
intention to avoid liability to tax; |
|
The
parties to the transfer circumvent the provisions of the Chapter
by splitting the transaction into several with each transaction
involving consideration of less than the prescribed limit.
The transactions are split either in terms of the interest
in property, the number of transferees or in the physical
dimensions of the property.
Several ingenious methods like joint collaboration projects
are undertaken to defeat the purpose of the Chapter.
Taking into account the above factors, the Expert Group constituted
by the Government in 1996 to review the existing Act and suggest
changes, has also recommended deletion of this Chapter.
Suggestion:
We, therefore, suggest that Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax
Act should altogether be deleted.
|
| |
|